引言至今还没有人撰写过一个国家的教育发展对其它国家教育改革的影响的历史。写这种历史,恐怕既不需要考虑到尽可能广泛的影响,又不需要作完整、全面的分析。比如,日本教育系统的结构,无疑是在二次大战后受美国的影响,几乎是重新建立起来的。但是,人们很难反驳这一论点:美国的影响没有涉足编纂课程的领域,更不用说“隐蔽”课程这一广泛领域和教与学的风格了。就德意志联邦共和国而言,人们无疑也能看到战后美国对课程改革的影响;但是,在40年后的今天,人们很难在西德教育的理论与实践中辨别出这些影响。有鉴于此,比较教育学家对被欧洲内外的许多国家看作是德国职业教育“典型”变式的“双重训 No one has ever written a history of the impact of the educational development in a country on the educational reform in other countries. Write this history, I am afraid neither need to consider the widest possible impact, but also do not need to make a complete and comprehensive analysis. For example, the structure of the Japanese education system was undoubtedly re-established by the United States after the Second World War. However, it is hard to disprove this argument: the influence of the United States has not covered the areas of codification of courses, not to mention the wide range of ”hidden" classes and the teaching and learning styles. In the case of the Federal Republic of Germany, there is no doubt that the post-war American influence on curriculum reform will also be visible; however, it is very difficult to discern these effects in the theory and practice of West German education 40 years later. In view of this, comparative educators have viewed many countries both inside and outside Europe as dual vocational training in German vocational education