作为证券分析师的研究分析成果,券商研报理应具有客观性、公正性、专业性和前瞻性。券商研报也一度被认为是专业投资机构的参考,普通投资者的“投资风向标”。但是,今年接连发生的“研报门”事件,将这些光环无情地粉碎。从此前的中国宝安、宁波联合、深国商,再到近期的涪陵榨菜、东阿阿胶、攀钢钒钛、紫鑫药业……券商研报大失水准、频频出错,甚至机构与机构或者机构与上市公 As a securities analyst research and analysis results, brokerage research reports should be objectivity, fairness, professionalism and forward-looking. Brokerage Research has also been considered as a reference for professional investment institutions, ordinary investors “investment vane ”. However, the series of “research reports” that took place this year have mercilessly smashed these rings. From the previous China Baoan, Ningbo United, Shen Guoshang, and then to the recent Fuling mustard, East donkey-hide gelatin, Panzhihua vanadium titanium, purple Xin medicine ...... Brokerage reported a large loss of quality, frequent mistakes, and even institutions and agencies or Institutions and the public