论文部分内容阅读
清史馆校对金梁在其《清史稿校刻记》中记载,《宣统皇帝本纪》为瑞洵原稿,奭良复辑。通过对台北故宫《清史馆未刊纪志表传稿本专辑》进行查考,可知《清史稿》最终采用的是瑞洵的原稿本,而非奭良的复辑本。辛亥革命是直接导致清朝覆亡的重大历史事件,对此事的表述方式和具体评价,直接反映出修史者的历史观点和政治立场。瑞洵和奭良虽同为满洲遗老,但《清史稿·宣统皇帝本纪》原稿本与复辑本,却对辛亥革命的记载详略不一,表述各异,反映出二人不尽相同的立场和观点。
Qing History Museum proofing Jin Liang in its “engraved engraved in the history of the Qing Dynasty,” recorded in the “Emperor Xuantong discipline” as the original copy of Rei Ji, 奭 good series. Through the examination of Taipei’s Forbidden City’s “History of the Qing Museum unpaid Ji Zhici biography of the album,” we can see that the “history of the Qing Dynasty,” the final use of the original version of the original, rather than a good complex. The 1911 Revolution is a major historical event that directly led to the demise of the Qing dynasty. The way of expressing and concrete appraisal of the incident directly reflects the historical viewpoint and political stand of the history-changing historian. Although both Ruih and 奭liang are Manchu elders, the manuscripts and the multiple editions of the Qing courtesy emperor Xudi Ji are very different from those of the 1911 Revolution. They are all very different and reflect that they are different Position and perspective.