论文部分内容阅读
“满堂灌”之弊端是世人皆知的,但时下却有一种由“满堂灌”转为“满堂问”的倾向。所谓“满堂问”,就是一堂课一直问下去,以问的形式,把知识间接传授给学生。至于学生的积极思维是不是真正调动起来了,是不是有利于学生自学能力的培养与形成,“满堂问”与“满堂灌”一样,效果都不是理想的。也就是说,二者都没有把培养学生的自学能力和充分调动学生的积极思维,看作是教学的首要目标和基本要求。 这就是“满堂问”的根本弊端所在,克服“满堂问”的倾向也要从解决这个根本弊端开始。 首先,要有正确和明确的提问目的。
The abuse of “full house irrigation” is known to the world, but nowadays there is a tendency to turn from “full house irrigation” to “full house”. The so-called “full house” is a class that has been asked all the time, in the form of asking questions, indirectly imparting knowledge to students. Whether or not students’ positive thinking is really mobilized is not conducive to the cultivation and formation of students’ self-study ability. The effect of “full house” and “full house irrigation” is not ideal. That is to say, neither of them regarded the cultivation of students’ self-learning ability and the full mobilization of students’ positive thinking as the primary goal and basic requirement of teaching. This is the fundamental flaw of the “full house”, and the tendency to overcome “full house” must also begin by addressing this fundamental drawback. First, there must be correct and clear questioning purposes.