论文部分内容阅读
我国刑法第125条非法买卖危险物质罪中并未对何为危险物质做出明确界定。同时,两高针对毒鼠强等禁用剧毒化学品违规买卖泛滥的现象,于2003年9月出台司法解释规制此类问题。然而,此解释仅针对涵盖毒鼠强在内的五类禁用剧毒化学品做了规定,相对而言,规制范围过窄。针对具体案件,我们应具体分析该条文和司法解释的关系来指导类似行为的定罪量刑。
China’s criminal law Article 125 illegal sale of dangerous substances in the crime did not make any clear definition of hazardous substances. At the same time, the two high against tetramine banned the proliferation of violent illegal trading in the phenomenon of the introduction of judicial interpretation in September 2003 to regulate such issues. However, this interpretation is limited to only five types of highly toxic banned chemicals, including tetramine, which are relatively narrow in scope. For specific cases, we should specifically analyze the relationship between the provision and judicial interpretation to guide the conviction and sentencing of similar acts.