论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析强化危急值项目的急诊病情转运交接记录单在转运交接中的应用效果。方法:选取2020年10月至12月存在危急值项目于常德市第一人民医院急诊科进行治疗的35例患者为对照组，其中男19例，女16例；年龄（56.89±5.41）岁，采用传统的急诊病情转运交接记录单进行转运交接；选取2021年1月至3月存在危急值项目于常德市第一人民医院急诊科进行治疗的40例患者为研究组，其中男23例，女17例，年龄（56.43±5.20）岁，采用强化危急值项目的转运交接记录单进行患者的转运交接。比较两组患者不良事件和危急值漏接发生情况、危急值处理时间以及两组患者和各科室医务人员对急诊科护理人员的满意度。结果:对照组不良事件发生率为45.71%（16/35），研究组为12.50%（5/40）；与对照组比较，研究组患者不良事件发生率和危急值漏交接率均降低（均n P＜0.05）。对照组血钾、血钠、血钙、血糖以及血气分析处理时间分别为（11.43±2.51）min、（3.51±0.63）min、（7.89±1.63）min、（16.45±4.30）min、（2.98±0.54）min，研究组分别为（7.35±1.38）min、（1.43±0.16）min、（4.52±1.12）min、（8.36±2.07）min、（1.03±0.11）min；研究组血钾、血钠、血钙、血糖以及血气分析等危急值处理时间明显缩短（均n P＜0.05）。对照组患者和各科室医务人员对急诊科护理人员的满意度分别为74.29%（26/35）、77.50%（31/40），研究组分别为92.50%（37/40）、97.50%（39/40）；与对照组比较，研究组患者和各科室医务人员对急诊科护理人员满意度均升高（均n P＜0.05）。n 结论:强化危急值项目的急诊病情转运交接记录单可以降低转运交接过程中患者不良事件的发生，加强后续各科室医务人员对危急值项目的重视，减少处理时间和纠纷，提升各科室医务人员和患者对急诊科护理人员的满意度。“,”Objective:To analyze the application effect of emergency condition transfer handover record sheet with strengthened critical value items in transfer handover.Methods:Thirty-five (56.89±5.41) years old patients with critical value items treated at Emergency Department, First People\'s Hospital of Changde City from October to December 2020 were selected as a control group, including 19 males and 16 females, and the traditional emergency condition transfer and handover record sheet was used for the transfer and handover in this group. Forty (56.43±5.20) years old patients with critical items treated at Emergency Department, First People\'s Hospital of Changde City from January to March 2021 were selected as a study group, including 23 males and 17 females, and the transfer and handover record of enhanced critical value items was used for the transfer and handover in this group. The occurrences of adverse events and missed critical values, the treatment times of critical values, and the patients\' and the medical staff\'s satisfaction with nursing staff in the two groups were compared.Results:The incidence of adverse events was 45.71% (16/35) in the control group, and was 12.50% (5/40) in the study group; the incidence of adverse events and the leakage rate of critical value in the study group were lower than those in the control group (both n P＜0.05). The treatment times of blood potassium, sodium, calcium, glucose, and blood gas analysis in the study group were shorter than those in the control group [(7.35±1.38) min vs. (11.43±2.51) min, (1.43±0.16) min vs. (3.51±0.63) min, (4.52±1.12) min vs. (7.89±1.63) min, (8.36±2.07) min vs. (16.45±4.30) min, and (1.03±0.11) min vs. (2.98±0.54) min; all n P＜0.05]. The patients\' and the medical staff\'s satisfaction with nursing staff in the study group were higher than those in the control group [92.50% (37/40) vs. 74.29% (26/35) and 97.50% (39/40) vs. 77.50% (31/40); both n P＜0.05].n Conclusion:Strengthening the emergency condition transfer and handover record sheet of critical value items can reduce the occurrence of adverse events in the process of transfer and handover, strengthen the attention of medical staff in follow-up departments to critical value items, reduce processing time and disputes, and improve the satisfaction of medical staff and patients in various departments with nursing staff in emergency department.